• Archives

  • Blog Stats

    • 678,511 hits
  • Categories

U.S. Bank, N.A. “as Trustee” Facing Sanctions In Miami — Livinglies’s Weblog

“It’s unusual that we’re in this position, but it’s unusual that any bank would dare do what they’re doing and think they are above the law like this.” – Bruce Jacobs, Miami Foreclosure Defense Lawyer. Kudos to Jacobs for doing some real lawyering. It is all in the details. Just assume they don’t have the…

via U.S. Bank, N.A. “as Trustee” Facing Sanctions In Miami — Livinglies’s Weblog

That is good news that at least one judge is sick and tired of the big banks acting like they are above the law and can ignore court orders.  More judges need to do what this judge is doing.

Your Property Appears to be the Federal Reserve Gold Standard — Deadly Clear

 

American Homeowners and GSE Shareholders – WAKE UP! The Treasury and GSEs hold the toxic MBS with inflated appraisals, flawed/fraudulent financial products, forged paperwork – and its what’s backing the Federal Reserve. Your property is their Gold Standard. #AuditTheFed Is it any wonder why HAMP was a scam when you realize this? Now you can […]

via Your Property Appears to be the Federal Reserve Gold Standard — Deadly Clear

Not surprising when you consider that the big banks own the Federal Reserve.

Cal. 3d DCA: WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE — You Can Cancel the Assignment, Notice of Default, Notice of Sale and Reverse the Sale. — Livinglies’s Weblog

This decision “Not for publication” takes one more step toward unravelling the false claims of securitization that resulted in millions of fake foreclosures over at least 15 years. The pure nonsense being peddled by Wall Street investment banks still remains as the underlying basis for assumptions and presumptions that are contrary to fact and contrary…

via Cal. 3d DCA: WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE — You Can Cancel the Assignment, Notice of Default, Notice of Sale and Reverse the Sale. — Livinglies’s Weblog

 

What should I pay my attorney?

You only get what you pay for may be an old saying but it is the absolute truth when it comes to hiring an attorney or any other professional.

Livinglies's Weblog

Like all professions the practice of law mostly involves activities that the client never sees. And it is the quantity and quality of work by the attorney that is the largest factor in getting a good result.

The best result is having the foreclosure dismissed or vacated with findings of fact that make it virtually impossible for the foreclosing party to try again. To get that result you need experienced trial counsel who does all the work he/she thinks is necessary to achieve the goal. Those are at the top of winning food chain.

If you must pay less then you must lower your goal or buy a winning lottery ticket.

Let us help you plan your foreclosure defense strategy, discovery requests and defense narrative: 202-838-6345. Ask for a Consult

PLEASE FILL OUT AND SUBMIT OUR FREE REGISTRATION FORMWITHOUT ANY OBLIGATION. OUR PRIVACY POLICY IS THAT WE DON’T USE…

View original post 801 more words

Conflict of Interest: Foreclosure Mills

Livinglies's Weblog

Despite warnings from Bar Associations and CLE courses that have been reported on this blog going back to 2008, lawyers routinely come into court and say “Good Morning your Honor, my name is John Smith and I represent US Bank.” That is not exactly true. In fact, it is a misrepresentation. In most cases the foreclosing party is named as a Trust, not a bank.  And the real client paying attorney fees is the CURRENT named servicer, who is taking instructions pursuant to some indemnification agreement with the named Master Trustee stated in the “trust instrument” (Pooling and servicing Agreement).

Not one of those parties has any interest in preserving the value of the collateral and in fact they all make a great deal of money when the foreclosure sale is “completed” and if the property is subject to a “credit bid” the proceeds of liquidation of the property to…

View original post 1,147 more words

WELLS FARGO GETS POUNDED BY U.S. GOVT FOR $2.09-BILLION … WITH A “B” … FINE!

This is good news although the government should have asked for a more substantial penalty such as $10 billion or more. The amount of $2.09 billion seems enormous to the average person but compared to the profits that Wells Fargo makes it is very small.

FIFTH U.S. CIRCUIT RULES FHFA UNCONSTITUTIONAL! — Clouded Titles Blog

BREAKING NEWS — OP-ED — This just received out of New Orleans … Collins et al v Mnuchin et al, 5th App Cir No 17-20364 (Jul 16, 2018) The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals denied damage awards to three investors who claim they lost money as shareholders in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac due to […]

via FIFTH U.S. CIRCUIT RULES FHFA UNCONSTITUTIONAL! — Clouded Titles Blog

Hopefully more of the United States Circuit Courts of Appeal will agree with this decision and also find that the Federal Housing Finance Agency is unconstitutional.

The Grand Deception — Dost-affixed-acations

THE GRAND DECEPTION AS TOLD BY A CHEVY CAMARO (trespass upon our property and living estate) by the living man, kenneth-william of the House Dost This story has to do with intentionally concealed MERS®, that is to say the MERS United States Registered Trademark and the underlying MERS/Nationsbank Credit Security Agreement, which is a material … Continue reading “The Grand Deception”

via The Grand Deception — Dost-affixed-acations

The Grand Deception — Dost-affixed-acations

THE GRAND DECEPTION AS TOLD BY A CHEVY CAMARO (trespass upon our property and living estate) by the living man, kenneth-william of the House Dost This story has to do with intentionally concealed MERS®, that is to say the MERS United States Registered Trademark and the underlying MERS/Nationsbank Credit Security Agreement, which is a material … Continue reading “The Grand Deception”

via The Grand Deception — Dost-affixed-acations

Is a Neg-AM Note a Negotiable Instrument? — Livinglies’s Weblog

The UCC is not ambivalent about protecting both the maker of a negotiable instrument and the party seeking to enforce it. The maker does not assume the risk of double liability except for instances where the note is purchased for value in good faith and without knowledge of the borrower’s defenses. In all other circumstances […]

via Is a Neg-AM Note a Negotiable Instrument? — Livinglies’s Weblog