• Archives

  • Blog Stats

    • 674,368 hits
  • Categories

  • Advertisements

What should I pay my attorney?

You only get what you pay for may be an old saying but it is the absolute truth when it comes to hiring an attorney or any other professional.

Livinglies's Weblog

Like all professions the practice of law mostly involves activities that the client never sees. And it is the quantity and quality of work by the attorney that is the largest factor in getting a good result.

The best result is having the foreclosure dismissed or vacated with findings of fact that make it virtually impossible for the foreclosing party to try again. To get that result you need experienced trial counsel who does all the work he/she thinks is necessary to achieve the goal. Those are at the top of winning food chain.

If you must pay less then you must lower your goal or buy a winning lottery ticket.

Let us help you plan your foreclosure defense strategy, discovery requests and defense narrative: 202-838-6345. Ask for a Consult

PLEASE FILL OUT AND SUBMIT OUR FREE REGISTRATION FORMWITHOUT ANY OBLIGATION. OUR PRIVACY POLICY IS THAT WE DON’T USE…

View original post 801 more words

Advertisements

Conflict of Interest: Foreclosure Mills

Livinglies's Weblog

Despite warnings from Bar Associations and CLE courses that have been reported on this blog going back to 2008, lawyers routinely come into court and say “Good Morning your Honor, my name is John Smith and I represent US Bank.” That is not exactly true. In fact, it is a misrepresentation. In most cases the foreclosing party is named as a Trust, not a bank.  And the real client paying attorney fees is the CURRENT named servicer, who is taking instructions pursuant to some indemnification agreement with the named Master Trustee stated in the “trust instrument” (Pooling and servicing Agreement).

Not one of those parties has any interest in preserving the value of the collateral and in fact they all make a great deal of money when the foreclosure sale is “completed” and if the property is subject to a “credit bid” the proceeds of liquidation of the property to…

View original post 1,147 more words

WELLS FARGO GETS POUNDED BY U.S. GOVT FOR $2.09-BILLION … WITH A “B” … FINE!

This is good news although the government should have asked for a more substantial penalty such as $10 billion or more. The amount of $2.09 billion seems enormous to the average person but compared to the profits that Wells Fargo makes it is very small.

Clouded Titles Blog

(BREAKING NEWS / OP-ED) — 

Why are we not surprised?

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has agreed to pay the United States $2.09-billion for purposefully misrepresenting the quality of loans it sold to 118 individual REMIC trusts.

See the Settlement Agreement here: Wells Fargo RMBS Settlement Agreement (August 1, 2018)

We caution you that when checking into your particular REMIC, if in fact one of these named entities shows up in your chain of title, to have any related assignments reviewed by competent counsel (we have one if you don’t) who can testify as to the false and misleading statements contained within said assignment in court, should you be facing foreclosure.  Any bank attorney making oral misrepresentations and false statements in court regarding any one of the named REMIC’s (given the fact we don’t yet know if the actual investors are being reimbursed out of these settlement funds and to what…

View original post 261 more words

FIFTH U.S. CIRCUIT RULES FHFA UNCONSTITUTIONAL! — Clouded Titles Blog

BREAKING NEWS — OP-ED — This just received out of New Orleans … Collins et al v Mnuchin et al, 5th App Cir No 17-20364 (Jul 16, 2018) The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals denied damage awards to three investors who claim they lost money as shareholders in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac due to […]

via FIFTH U.S. CIRCUIT RULES FHFA UNCONSTITUTIONAL! — Clouded Titles Blog

Hopefully more of the United States Circuit Courts of Appeal will agree with this decision and also find that the Federal Housing Finance Agency is unconstitutional.

The Grand Deception — Dost-affixed-acations

THE GRAND DECEPTION AS TOLD BY A CHEVY CAMARO (trespass upon our property and living estate) by the living man, kenneth-william of the House Dost This story has to do with intentionally concealed MERS®, that is to say the MERS United States Registered Trademark and the underlying MERS/Nationsbank Credit Security Agreement, which is a material … Continue reading “The Grand Deception”

via The Grand Deception — Dost-affixed-acations

The Grand Deception — Dost-affixed-acations

THE GRAND DECEPTION AS TOLD BY A CHEVY CAMARO (trespass upon our property and living estate) by the living man, kenneth-william of the House Dost This story has to do with intentionally concealed MERS®, that is to say the MERS United States Registered Trademark and the underlying MERS/Nationsbank Credit Security Agreement, which is a material … Continue reading “The Grand Deception”

via The Grand Deception — Dost-affixed-acations

Is a Neg-AM Note a Negotiable Instrument? — Livinglies’s Weblog

The UCC is not ambivalent about protecting both the maker of a negotiable instrument and the party seeking to enforce it. The maker does not assume the risk of double liability except for instances where the note is purchased for value in good faith and without knowledge of the borrower’s defenses. In all other circumstances […]

via Is a Neg-AM Note a Negotiable Instrument? — Livinglies’s Weblog

%d bloggers like this: