• Archives

  • Blog Stats

    • 673,104 hits
  • Categories

  • Advertisements

BILLIONS MADE AS HOUSING GOES DOWN UNDER SWEETHEART FDIC LOSS SHARING DEAL — Livinglies’s Weblog

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES GET COMBO TITLE AND SECURITIZATION ANALYSIS – CLICK HERE EDITOR’S COMMENT: On the IndyMac portfolio alone, they made billions while the investors and homeowners got crammed down with double-talk about where the money went. I have been saying for years that there is far more money to be made by banks, servicers, […]

via BILLIONS MADE AS HOUSING GOES DOWN UNDER SWEETHEART FDIC LOSS SHARING DEAL — Livinglies’s Weblog

This article is an excellent explanation of why OneWest and others are more interested in foreclosing than exploring other solutions. They make more money when they foreclose because of the sweetheart deals that they finagle from the FDIC and other government agencies.

Advertisements

Motions for Summary Judgment — Livinglies’s Weblog

If the homeowner files it most likely it will be denied. If the pretender lender files it, the homeowner should take it seriously. The issue is simple — are there questions or issues of ultimate fact about which the parties disagree. If yes, motion denied. If not, motion is granted. Beware of a potential trap. […]

via Motions for Summary Judgment — Livinglies’s Weblog

 

REHYPOTHECATION IS YOUR WEAPON TO ESTABLISH THERE WAS NEVER A MORTGAGE LOAN – THESE WERE ALWAYS SECURITIES! — Deadly Clear

Originally posted on Deadly Clear: By Sydney Sullivan In a world where the American Dream and Wall Street greed collide, when your life and home are no longer your own, we must look beyond the facade of the documents and dig deeper into the public archives to seek the truth of the concealed path that is…

via REHYPOTHECATION IS YOUR WEAPON TO ESTABLISH THERE WAS NEVER A MORTGAGE LOAN – THESE WERE ALWAYS SECURITIES! — Deadly Clear

 

SIX YEARS LATER … AND THEY’RE STILL ROBOSIGNING!

I am not surprised that the big banks are still robosigning documents. The odds of them being prosecuted are slim and none. In California any person can obtain a copy of the journal record for a notary under Government Code section 8206.5 which states that, “Upon receiving a request for a copy of a transaction pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 8206, the notary shall respond to the request within 15 business days after receipt of the request and either supply the photostatic copy requested or acknowledge that no such line item exists. In a disciplinary proceeding for noncompliance with subdivision (c) of Section 8206 or this section, a notary may defend his or her delayed action on the basis of unavoidable, exigent business or personal circumstances.” https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=GOV&sectionNum=8206.5.

Everyone should research the laws that relate to notaries in their state.

Clouded Titles Blog

OP-ED — 

In March of 2012, all of the major servicers and the 49 States Attorneys General (except Oklahoma) inked an agreement wherein the servicers would stop the then-common practice of “robosigning” documents.  Six years later and it’s still going on.  I thought it best to clarify a few things before discussing where we are today.

Robosigning was a term referenced often by the late Kings County, New York Judge Arthur Schack, wherein he described the act of affixing signatures to documents in such a manner that: (a.) the signatures were illegible; (b.) the signatures could have been affixed by anyone [also known as surrogate signing]; (c.) contained information that was grossly distorted or misrepresentative [in HSBC v Taher_Schack, he noted that the address of the REMIC was at the same address as that of Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC in Palm Beach County, Florida], and now Ocwen Financial…

View original post 2,578 more words

Fact Check: Robo-witness knows nothing — Livinglies’s Weblog

Information is admitted in evidence only after a proper foundation has been laid. If the witness knows nothing about the foundation the evidence should not be admitted as evidence. Appellate courts will usually reverse a trial court’s error in ruling on evidence UNLESS the appellate panel decides that the error would not have made any […]

via Fact Check: Robo-witness knows nothing — Livinglies’s Weblog

What you don’t know could hurt you: Google censoring documents for the Banks? — Livinglies’s Weblog

Chung v. CitiMortgage Fraud By J. Guggenheim Today, while researching an old CitiMortgage case where an employee committed perjury and CitiMortgage admitted to document fabrication (entitled Sun Ae Chung v. Just Mortgage Inc., Federal Home Loan Mortgage and CitiMortgage) the case disappeared and was no longer available. This time last year, the case was readily […]

via What you don’t know could hurt you: Google censoring documents for the Banks? — Livinglies’s Weblog

Rescission Precision Goes to U.S. Supreme Court Petition for Mandamus — Livinglies’s Weblog

10 years ago, seeing where the foreclosure wave was going and watching court cases, I said on these pages that the only solution to these foreclosures is Mandamus. First to stop judges from applying legal PRESUMPTIONS and second to stop judges from ignoring TILA rescission. Now someone has done it and others might follow suit, […]

via Rescission Precision Goes to U.S. Supreme Court Petition for Mandamus — Livinglies’s Weblog

 

%d bloggers like this: