• Archives

  • Blog Stats

    • 675,970 hits
  • Categories

Legal podcasts by Stan Burman

Legal podcasts by Stan Burman.

Legal podcasts by Stan Burman.

Legal podcasts by Stan Burman are now available on Podomatic.

There are ten legal podcasts by Stan Burman currently available:

Defenses to an unlawful detainer (eviction) complaint in California.
Demurrer to unawful detainer (eviction) complaint in California.
Three-day notice to pay rent or quit in California.
Answer to unlawful detainer (eviction) complaint in California
Motion to quash service of summons in California.
Demurrer to complaint in California.
Requests for production of documents in California.
Special interrogatories in California.
Amendment of pleadings in California.
Opposition to motion in California.

You can listen to any or all of the podcasts by clicking the link below.

Over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation for sale.

To view more information on over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation visit: https://legaldocspro.myshopify.com/products

The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale.

Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit http://freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/  for more information.

Follow Stan Burman on Twitter at:

https://twitter.com/legaldocspro

Like the Facebook page for Legaldocspro at:

https://www.facebook.com/LegalDocsPro/

DISCLAIMER:

Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.

The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

Creative Mediation System in British Columbia: A Model For Us All — MEDIATBANKRY

By: Donald L. Swanson “We have been much struck by the system operated in British Columbia whereby a party can issue a notice to their opponent in a specified form requiring mediation.” “[T]he establishment” of such a system “has led to the growth of informally agreed mediation as a norm” with the formal procedure “only […]

via Creative Mediation System in British Columbia: A Model For Us All — MEDIATBANKRY

I have worked on quite a few cases where mediation has resulted in a settlement.

Breaking it Down: What to Say and Do in an Unlawful Detainer or Eviction — Livinglies’s Weblog

Homeowners seem to have more options than they think in an unlawful detainer action based upon my analysis. It is the first time in a nonjudicial foreclosure where the foreclosing party is actually making assertions and representations against which the homeowner may defend. The deciding factor is what to do at trial. And the answer, […]

via Breaking it Down: What to Say and Do in an Unlawful Detainer or Eviction — Livinglies’s Weblog

10th Circuit refuses to apply Jesinoski decision

US Bank, rescission,

via 10th Circuit Challenges SCOTUS on TILA Rescission — Pohl v US Bank, “Trustee” — Livinglies’s Weblog

This is a bad decision that is made even worse by the fact that this decision is published which means that it is now binding authority in all Courts under the jurisdiction of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.  The real danger is that Judges in other areas of the United States can still cite this case as persuasive authority.

California bill would allow consumers to sue banks for fraud

California took another step on Tuesday toward allowing state residents to sue financial institutions for fraud, rather than letting banks force customers to settle disputes in arbitration, as a bill inspired by last year’s Wells Fargo scandal passed a key Assembly committee. The bill has already passed the state Senate. The full Assembly, the legislature’s […]

via California moves forward on letting customers sue banks, inspired by Wells Fargo — Justice League

This bill would be a great help to consumers in California who are forced to accept arbitration clauses as a condition of purchasing goods or services.

Demanding expert witness information in California

http://www.legaldocspro.com/blog/demanding-expert-witness-information-in-california/

Special demurrer for uncertainty in California

http://www.legaldocspro.com/blog/special-demurrer-for-uncertainty-in-california/

%d bloggers like this: