• Archives

  • Blog Stats

    • 673,108 hits
  • Categories

  • Advertisements

RED Herring: VOID, VOIDABLE — What difference does it make?

Livinglies's Weblog

Just a short note this Holiday extended weekend.

The banks have raised the whole issue of void or voidable based upon the potential for ratification. That is a red herring. The fact that something COULD happen does not mean it DID happen. What is even worse is when a court decides based upon the absurd notion that the act could have been ratified already despite the nonexistence of any evidence or even a claim that such ratification occurred.

So when Trust XYZ makes a claim then homeowner files the defenses or a lawsuit stating, for example, that the cut-off period has expired and the allegations or evidence shows that the paper documents all show the same thing — an effort to transfer the loan after the cutoff date.

So in plain English, the Trust is saying we own the loan and the Homeowner is saying you don’t own the loan…

View original post 314 more words


What is your opinion?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: