• Archives

  • Blog Stats

    • 668,323 hits
  • Categories

Opposing a motion to vacate judgment under section 473.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Opposing a motion to vacate judgment under section 473.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure in California is the topic of this blog post. If you have been served with a motion to vacate judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 473.5 alleging a lack of actual notice you should carefully review the motion and supporting declarations and exhibits to determine what grounds for opposition exist.

Note that the opposition should be filed with the court at least nine (9) court days before the hearing and served by personal service or overnight mail pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1005.

Common grounds for opposing a motion to vacate filed under Code of Civil Procedure section 473.5 include that the moving party has not shown a satisfactory explanation for the delay between their discovery of the default and judgment, and that any alleged lack of actual notice was caused by inexcusable neglect and avoidance of service.

California Code of Civil Procedure § 473.5 states in pertinent part that: “When service of a summons has not resulted in actual notice to a party in time to defend the action and a default or default judgment has been entered against him or her in the action, he or she may serve and file a notice of motion to set aside the default or default judgment and for leave to defend the action. The notice of motion shall be served and filed within a reasonable time, but in no event exceeding the earlier of: (I) two years after entry of a default judgment against him or her; or (ii) 180 days after service on him or her of a written notice that the default or default judgment has been entered.”, and “Upon a finding by the court that the motion was made within the period permitted by subdivision (a) and that his or her lack of actual notice in time to defend the action was not caused by his or her avoidance of service or inexcusable neglect, it may set aside the default or default judgment on whatever terms as may be just and allow the party to defend the action.”

Several California Courts of Appeal have ruled in published decisions that the moving party must show that their lack of actual notice in time to defend the action was not caused by inexcusable neglect or avoidance of service.

Another California Court of Appeal has ruled in a published decision that the motion must be supported by an affidavit or declaration containing admissible and competent evidence.

Even if the motion is granted the court still has the power to order that as a condition of the default and judgment being vacated that the defendant pay reasonable costs including attorney fees incurred by the plaintiff in obtaining the default judgment pursuant to subdivision (c) of section 473.5 which states that relief may be granted “on such terms as may be just.”

Attorneys or parties in California that would like to view a portion of a 10 page sample opposition to a motion to vacate under Code of Civil Procedure section 473.5 containing brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority and sample declaration sold by the author can see below.

 

Attorneys or parties in California that would like more information on a California law and motion litigation document package containing over 55 sample documents including a sample opposition to a motion to vacate judgment under CCP section 473.5  can use the link shown below.

California law and motion litigation document package

The author of this article, Stan Burman, is a freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995.

Follow the author on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/LegalDocsPro

View legal document packages for sale at: http://www.legaldocspro.net

Subscribe to my weekly newsletter with legal tips and tricks for California. http://www.legaldocspro.net/newsletter.htm

The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation.

You can view portions of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation at http://www.scribd.com/LegalDocsPro

*Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit http://freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/ for more information.

DISCLAIMER:

Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.

The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

Advertisements

What is your opinion?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: