• Archives

  • Blog Stats

    • 668,201 hits
  • Categories

Motion to continue criminal trial or hearing in California

A motion for continuance of a trial or hearing in a criminal case in California is the topic of this blog post. The requirements that must be satisfied to obtain a continuance are detailed in California Penal Code Sections 1050 et seq. A careful reading of these requirements is essential as failure to comply may result in the motion being denied, and possible sanctions.

Written notice must be filed and served on all parties at least two court days before the hearing sought to be continued and must include affidavits or declarations detailing specific facts showing that a continuance is necessary. See Penal Code § 1050(b)(1). Unless a waiver of service has been obtained, service of the required notice is not deemed satisfied until the nonmoving party actually receives the documents. See Penal Code § 1050(b).

If a party files a motion to continue without providing the two court days notice, the court is required to hold a hearing to determine if good cause exists for the failure to provide notice. If the moving party is unable to show good cause, the motion to continue must be denied. See Penal Code § 1050(d). In addition the moving party is subject to sanctions, including a fine of up to $1,000. See Penal Code §§ 1050(c), 1050.5.

The moving party is also required to establish good cause to have the motion granted on its merits. See Penal Code § 1050(e). Even if good cause is established, the case should be continued only for the period of time necessary as shown by evidence considered at the hearing on the motion. See Penal Code § 1050(i).

The trial court has very broad discretion to determine whether good cause exists to grant a continuance. However that discretion must be not exercised so as to result in a manifest miscarriage of justice resulting from inadequate time to prepare a defense.

A party who requests a continuance in order to secure the testimony of a witness must show due diligence in securing the attendance of the witness, the witness would not be available to testify within a reasonable time, that the testimony was material and not cumulative,” and the facts about which the witness is expected to testify cannot otherwise be proven.

Other situations that may constitute good cause for a continuance include when defense counsel or a self-represented defendant needs additional time to prepare and investigate the case. And if if new counsel takes over for previous counsel, and the late substitution was not made in bad faith, it is error to deny new counsel a continuance to prepare.

Attorneys or parties in California who would like to view a portion of a 14 page sample motion to continue a trial or hearing in a criminal case that includes a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority sold by the author can see below.

The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation.

*Do you want to use this article on your website, blog or e-zine? You can, as long as you include this blurb with it: “Stan Burman is the author of over 300 sample legal documents for California and Federal litigation and is the author of a free weekly legal newsletter. You can receive 10 free gifts just for subscribing. Just visit http://freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/ for more information.

Follow the author on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/LegalDocsPro

You can view sample legal document packages for sale by going to http://www.legaldocspro.com/downloads.aspx


Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.

The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.








What is your opinion?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: