• Archives

  • Blog Stats

    • 667,704 hits
  • Categories

Child support modifications in California

Child support modifications in California are the topic of this blog post.  In California child support can be ordered in a dissolution, legal separation or nullity proceeding. California Family Code section 3651(a) states that “A support order may be modified at any time as the Court determines to be necessary.”  Unless a stipulation and order is signed by both parties and filed with the Court any child support modification in California requires that an order to show cause or notice of motion be filed.

The general rule in California is that a material change of circumstances must be shown before child support can be either increased or decreased

Both parents of a minor child are equally responsible to support the minor child in California.

“The father and mother of a minor child have an equal responsibility to support their child in the manner suitable to the child’s circumstances.” See Family Code § 3900.

And the California Courts have held that an order reducing child support payments can issue in cases where there is an increase in the amount of time the child spends in the obligor parent’s custody such as increased visitation. This is allowable under the theory that all or part of the  day-to-day needs of the minor child are being discharged directly by the obligor parent.

Both case law and statutory law in California state that the parents’ actual earnings are not necessarily controlling on the question of ability to pay.

“The court may, in its discretion, consider the earning capacity of a parent in lieu of the parents’ income, consistent with the best interests of the children.”  Family Code § 4058(b).

Thus in appropriate situations the California Courts can consider the earning capacity of a parent instead of that parent’s actual income.  Appropriate cases would be where the other parent is capable of working despite claiming to be unemployed or underemployed but refuses to work, or the income of the other parent has increased substantially since the date of the last support order.  A deliberate attempt to avoid child support obligations is not required.

Both the California Courts of Appeal and the California Supreme Court have held that the only restriction imposed by the California child support statutes is that consideration of earning capacity be consistent with the best interests of the minor child.

In one case decided by a California Court of Appeal the Court found no abuse of discretion in refusing to change the monthly income figure of the wife to zero where the facts in the case clearly showed that she quit work upon remarrying but she presented no evidence of any inability to find replacement employment or that her loss of income was otherwise justifiable under the facts in that case.

In another California Court of Appeal case the Court found that the husband had the opportunity to work and imputed income to him on the grounds that he was an attorney who could apply his skills and training to produce income.

Anyone considering requesting a modification of child support in California should be sure to include enough facts and evidence to show a material change of circumstances since the date of the last child support order.

Attorneys or parties in California who would like to view a portion of a sample points and authorities in support of a request for order to modify child support in California that is sold by the author can see below.

 

Attorneys or parties in California that would like more information on a California divorce litigation document package containing over 45 sample documents including a sample points and authorities in support of a request for order to modify child support can use the link shown below.

California divorce litigation document package

The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is a freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 300 sample legal documents.

Follow the author on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/LegalDocsPro

If you enjoy this blog post, tell others about it. You can subscribe to the author’s FREE weekly California land Federal egal newsletter by visiting the following link: http://freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/

Copyright 2013 Stan Burman. All rights reserved.

<strong>DISCLAIMER:</strong>

Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. The author is NOT engaged in providing any legal, financial, or other professional services, and any information contained in this blog post is NOT intended to constitute legal advice.

The materials and information contained in this blog post have been prepared by Stan Burman for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Transmission of the information contained in this blog post is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, any business relationship between the author and any readers. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

Advertisements

What is your opinion?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: