• Archives

  • Blog Stats

    • 667,011 hits
  • Categories

Vacating a property settlement agreement (MSA) in California

Vacating a property settlement agreement or marital settlement agreement in California is the topic of this blog post.  This post will focus mostly on vacating a property settlement agreement based on one party having an undue influence on the other party because of undue influence such as taking advantage of another due to distress or weakness of mind.

The author worked on a case over 10 years ago in which the wife had signed a property settlement agreement in which she agreed to accept just over $5,000.00 as full and complete reimbursement for her share of the community property. At the time that the wife signed the agreement she was not represented by counsel, and she did not consult with any attorney prior to signing the agreement. She was also late on her rent and did not have any money to pay her rent as she was not working at the time she signed the agreement.

The husband had a large amount of property, much more than the wife, and the wife may have had a community property share. And the agreement was signed before any petition for dissolution of marriage (divorce) had even been filed so the required declarations of disclosure had not been exchanged.

A California Court of Appeal has held that the least overreaching or misrepresentation allowing one spouse to gain the property of the other is fraudulent, and will justify an action to avoid the agreement.

In this case, the wife signed the agreement to not go after anything of her husband’s if he gave her just over $5,000.00. She only signed the agreement because her rent was 3 days late and she had no money and no job and would be evicted otherwise. Clearly this was a case of not only one spouse taking unfair advantage of the other spouse, but overreaching of the highest degree as someone who is flat broke and about to be evicted is obviously under extreme stress, and therefore highly vulnerable.

An exchange of prescribed “preliminary” disclosure declarations is mandatory and nonwaivable. See California Family Code § 2104.

In dissolution proceedings commenced after 1992, no agreement is enforceable with respect to the parties property rights unless both spouses have executed and served on the opposition the final declaration of disclosure required by Family Code § 2105 unless both parties have signed a voluntary waiver of those requirements. California Family Code § 2106.

That fact alone required the Court to vacate the agreement. And now we come to the issues of duress, undue influence and gross inadequacy of the consideration received.

If they are not merged into a judgment, marital settlement agreements are voidable under general contract principles where a party lacked contractual capacity, or consented due to fraud, duress, undue influence or mistake.

A marital settlement agreements that is not part of the judgment may be set aside if the court finds it to be inequitable, even in the absence of fraud or compulsion. Also, the courts will carefully scrutinize agreements made by a party without the advice of legal counsel. In re Marriage of Moore (1980) 113 Cal. App.3d 22, 27 see also Adams v. Adams (1947) 29 Cal. 2d 621, 628.

An agreement lacks valid consent where one party takes unfair advantage of the other party’s weakness of mind or distress. The exertion of the “undue influence” deprives the other party of the ability to exercise “free will”. California Civil Code § 1575, In re Marriage of Saslow (1985) 40 Cal. App. 3d 848, 864.

By statute, spouses stand in a confidential relationship in transactions between themselves and in that context, are subject to the general rules governing fiduciary relationships. California Family Code §§ 721(b), 1100(e).

The California Supreme Court has stated that undue influence can be shown by the physical or mental weakness of the party claiming undue influence due to economic distress.

And undue influence can also be shown by gross inadequacy of the consideration received by the party claiming undue influence as stated by a California Court of Appeal.

Note that once a marital settlement agreement has been merged into a judgment that it will not be voidable under general contract principles.

It may be possible to vacate the judgment if one party did not fully comply with the California Family Code relating to declarations of disclosure.

Those provisions of the marital settlement agreement that are merged in the judgment become an order of the court; the “merged” agreement is superseded by the judgment and ceases to be of independent legal significance. As a result, the agreement can then be enforced only as a judgment (by contempt, execution, etc.) it is no longer enforceable by contract remedies and, unless otherwise provided by the judgment, any warranties are extinguished by the judgment. Marriage of Lynn (2002) 101 CalApp. 4th 120, 130 (citing text).

Attorneys or parties in California who would like to view a portion of a points and authorities in support of a motion or request for order to vacate a property settlement agreement sold by the author can see below.

 

Attorneys or parties in California that would like more information on a California divorce litigation document package containing over 45 sample documents including a points and authorities in support of a motion or request for order to vacate a property settlement agreement can use the link shown below.

California divorce litigation document package

The author of this blog post, Stan Burman, is a freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995.

Subscribe to his weekly newsletter with legal tips and tricks for California. http://www.legaldocspro.net/newsletter.htm

Advertisements

3 Responses

  1. Thanks a lot for the article.Much thanks again. Really Great.

    Like

  2. Thank you for this. My attorney told me there was a 6 month time limitation on vacating property settlement. I’m very glad I found this.

    Like

What is your opinion?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: