Petition to compel arbitration in California

A petition to compel arbitration in California is the topic of this blog post. This post will outline the issues involved for a party who wishes to file a petition to compel arbitration in California. Many agreements and contracts now include an arbitration provision providing that all disputes, or in some cases certain disputes shall be sent to arbitration. The California Code of Civil Procedure has provisions relating to a petition to compel arbitration.

The primary purpose of arbitration is to provide a speedy and relatively inexpensive means of dispute resolution.

California Code of Civil Procedure § 1281.2 states in pertinent part that:  “On petition of a party to an arbitration agreement alleging the existence of a written agreement to arbitrate a controversy, and that a party thereto refuses to arbitrate the controversy, the court shall order the parties to so arbitrate if it determines that such an agreement exists.”

Thus the statutes in California provide a procedure by which a party who wishes to submit a dispute to arbitration can petition the court to compel the other party to arbitrate the dispute, provided that a valid agreement exists with a provision that certain disputes, or in some cases all disputes, shall be arbitrated. The statutes regarding arbitration state that the party seeking to compel arbitration has the burden of proving that a written agreement to arbitrate exists.

California Code of Civil Procedure § 1281.2 states in pertinent part that, “When a petition to compel arbitration is filed and accompanied by prima facie evidence of a written agreement to arbitrate the controversy, the court itself must decide whether the agreement exists, and if any defense to its enforcement is raised, whether the agreement is enforceable. Because existence of the agreement is a statutory prerequisite to granting the petition, the petitioner bears the burden of proving its existence by a preponderance of the evidence.”

The case law in California is clear that there is a strong public policy in favor of arbitration, and that any doubts as to the scope of an agreement to arbitrate are to be resolved in favor of arbitration.  However, a party can be compelled to arbitrate only those issues it has agreed to arbitrate.

The California Supreme Court has stated that it is well established that under California law there is a strong public policy in favor of arbitration.

And a California Court of Appeal has also stated that any doubts as to the scope of an agreement to arbitrate are to be resolved in favor of arbitration. See Hayes Children Leasing Co. v. NCR Corp.(1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 775, 788.

Attorneys or parties in California who would like to view a portion of a  sample petition to compel arbitration  complete with a memorandum of points and authorities with full citations to case law and statutory authority, and a sample declaration that is sold by the author can see below

The author of this article, Stan Burman, is a freelance paralegal who has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995. If you are in need of assistance with any California or Federal litigation matters, Mr. Burman is available on a freelance basis. Mr. Burman may be contacted by e-mail at DivParalgl@yahoo.com for more information. He accepts payments through PayPal which means that you can pay using most credit or debit cards.

Subscribe to his weekly newsletter with legal tips and tricks for California.  http://www.legaldocspro.net/newsletter.htm

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s